I think I am finally giving up, Jen!.
Three years ago I found a community that accepted me without disdain despite an embarrassing disability. That fraternity is naturism, as safe for women and children as it is for me. I have fought to the point of pain for this community but there is a place
where you become King Canute against the tide.
Two years ago Ning undertook a purge of all adult sites that proliferated sex, fetish and perversion. Damned right too! I sat up three sleepless nights thrashing out with their team the groundwork and criteria for eliminating all adult sites, while allowing genuine nudist networks to continue. It has been a golden period.
With Ning's recent changes it looks like I will have to start again. Gina Bianchini's departure was a sad day for our lifestyle.
I must stress that, as naturists, we as a community will not and, in
fact, cannot be associated with any platform or network that publicly emphasises sex. We are a clean community for everyone of all ages (with rare online exceptions like NudistSpace). No child abuse, rape, public sexuality or sexism here, or else you are out the gate followed closely by your clothes! This is how we are and we don't apologise for it.
I am afraid the opposite applies to mainstream society. You only have to look in today's news at the slavering stampede on
Facebook after the "sexiest clip ever". Pathetic! I gleefully hope the virus rots their hardware LOL! Anyway, the problem is that the vast majority of people out there in your world are so perverted they cannot contemplate nudity without thinking of sex. My personal view is they should be banned by law from bathing their kids! But it is pure clean-living people like nudists who are the victims.
Look, Jen, there are about 40-50 true naturist networks on ning which need somewhere to migrate. They are 100% NON-sexual (since I got the only ringer closed down and investigated by the FBI/IINI), but this puts them at odds with this sadly depraved mainstream society. Apart from Ning, every network creator platform is so preoccupied with sex they will only allow us "adult" status. How can that be; a quarter of our community is under 18!
We cannot be a "lifestyle" without a new generation. So children are an important part of our edenist philosophy. Not all our sites have underage members, but here is the crunch!
One of our sites is nudist but welcomes minors, insofar as it
is better they find a safe place for guidance rather than fall into the wrong hands ""out there"". However, ....photos are disabled in the common areas; nudity IS permitted, but in private adult groups only; minor membership relies wholly on certified ID based on a unique code sent by us that they have to show in an immediately returned (clothed) profile photo. Yes, it couldn't be any safer, but where would this fit in an adult directory? Furthermore how could the teen-nudists afford a pay-site?
In an immoral world, you can see that the naturist world has to be very guarded about who it "mixes with". Bedsharing with masturbation and fetish sites would only attract the wrong type of applicant. We are not an adult community; Ms Bianchini and Ning understood that, Jen. I miss her badly!
Nobody except the Amish can thrive in the 21st century without an internet presence. Even the Mennonites are online! But now we have nowhere to go.
- grou.ps is unreliable (I have previously explained).
- wackwall, socialgo, joomla & spruz all have perverted preconceptions because, as I said, they cannot see "nudity" without thinking "sex".
- Yuku and BuddyPress are just forums.
Yes we have the oversubscribed, juggernaut sites like True Nudists and Nudist Clubhouse, but where do the private, networks, the friendship circles set up?
Has anyone any suggestions as a safe place for our online home? No, I guess not!
Thanks, Jason Rosenthal, thanks a lot!!!!!
That seems about it for the private naturist social networking community online doesn't it, Jen? I can't shed any more tears!
Thanxxx4 trying and kind regards,
Will Golden